1999 AC Cobra vs. 1996 BMW M3

To start off, 1999 AC Cobra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1999 AC Cobra. (222 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1999 AC Cobra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 455 kg more than 1999 AC Cobra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Cobra (522 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (320 Nm). This means 1999 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3.

Compare all specifications:

1999 AC Cobra 1996 BMW M3
Make AC BMW
Model Cobra M3
Year Released 1999 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4941 cc 3246 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 222 HP 240 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 522 Nm 320 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.2:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1025 kg 1480 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1210 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 63 L