1999 AC Cobra vs. 2006 Holden UTE
To start off, 2006 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Cobra (222 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2006 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Holden UTE weights approximately 475 kg more than 1999 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Cobra (522 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden UTE. (305 Nm). This means 1999 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Cobra | 2006 Holden UTE | |
| Make | AC | Holden |
| Model | Cobra | UTE |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4941 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2950 mm |
