1999 Acura CL vs. 2012 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2012 Renault Symbol is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura CL (200 HP) has 103 more horse power than 2012 Renault Symbol. (97 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Symbol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 580 kg more than 2012 Renault Symbol. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Acura CL | 2012 Renault Symbol | |
| Make | Acura | Renault |
| Model | CL | Symbol |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 97 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4826 mm | 4261 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1781 mm | 1639 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1389 mm | 1439 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2715 mm | 2473 mm |
