1999 Acura EL vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Acura EL would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1999 Acura EL. (127 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1999 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura CSX weights approximately 234 kg more than 1999 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Acura EL | 2006 Acura CSX | |
Make | Acura | Acura |
Model | EL | CSX |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1079 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4478 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1704 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1394 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2619 mm | 2700 mm |