1999 Acura Integra vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 1999 Acura Integra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1999 Acura Integra. (138 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1999 Acura Integra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Dodge Polara weights approximately 355 kg more than 1999 Acura Integra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Acura Integra | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | Acura | Dodge |
| Model | Integra | Polara |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 5905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2960 mm |
