1999 Acura Integra vs. 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 1999 Acura Integra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 310 kg more than 1999 Acura Integra.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Acura Integra | 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | Integra | Monte Carlo |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |
