1999 Acura NSX vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura NSX (276 HP @ 7300 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (197 HP @ 7250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio.
Because 1999 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Acura NSX (304 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM). This means 1999 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Acura NSX | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Acura | Renault |
Model | NSX | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 7300 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |