1999 Acura TL vs. 2013 Ford E-Series

To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Acura TL would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1999 Acura TL. (226 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 1999 Acura TL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1255 kg more than 1999 Acura TL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Ford E-Series is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford E-Series. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Acura TL. (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Acura TL.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Acura TL 2013 Ford E-Series
Make Acura Ford
Model TL E-Series
Year Released 1999 2013
Body Type Sedan Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3210 cc 5400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 226 HP 252 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 294 Nm 474 Nm
Torque RPM 4700 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 9.06:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 4-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 12 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 2830 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 5504 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 2017 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 2111 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 3505 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 150 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]