1999 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 1952 Allard K2
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 (153 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 weights approximately 42 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo 145 | 1952 Allard K2 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
Model | 145 | K2 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |