1999 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. (104 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 920 kg more than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 458 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. (124 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo 145 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 145 | 62 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1369 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 582 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 64.9 mm | 98.4 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 75 L |