1999 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 1963 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. (118 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 960 kg more than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 438 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. (144 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo 145 | 1963 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 145 | Sixty |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 582 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 98.4 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 79 L |