1999 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. (120 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 427 kg more than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (264 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. (144 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo 145 | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 145 | CTS |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 264 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1592 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.5 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.2 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 64 L |