1999 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 (153 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (137 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 8 kg more than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (195 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. (187 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo 145 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
Model | 145 | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.1 mm | 90.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.1:1 |
Top Speed | 211 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.3 seconds | 9.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.6 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 55 L |