1999 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander

To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 (153 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 173 kg more than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander (196 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. (187 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Alfa Romeo 145 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander
Make Alfa Romeo Mitsubishi
Model 145 Outlander
Year Released 1999 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1970 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 153 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 187 Nm 196 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4200 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1242 kg 1415 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4295 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1631 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Consumption 6.6 L/100km 7.6 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 8.7 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 63 L