1999 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 would be higher. At 1,747 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 (142 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2012 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo 145 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
Model | 145 | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 17.9:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.1 seconds | 12.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 4.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 55 L |