1999 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. (153 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 1384 kg more than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 374 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. (191 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo 145. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE has automatic transmission and 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 has manual transmission. 1999 Alfa Romeo 145 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo 145 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 145 | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.4 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 2594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5144 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2947 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.6 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.7 L/100km | 18 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 98 L |