1999 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1999 Alfa Romeo 146.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo 146, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Alfa Romeo 146 | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 146 | 60 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 5671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3230 mm |
