1999 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 2005 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo 146. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo 146 would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 142 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 141 kg more than 1999 Alfa Romeo 146.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (211 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo 146. (169 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo 146.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo 146 | 2005 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
Model | 146 | Sebring |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 2425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 211 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1421 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 62 L |