1999 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo 146. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo 146 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 109 kg more than 1999 Alfa Romeo 146.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo 146 (260 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo 146 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo 146 | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 146 | 6 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 260 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.2:1 | 10.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1354 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 64 L |