1999 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo 146. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo 146 would be higher. At 1,370 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo 146 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Alfa Romeo 146 weights approximately 175 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo 146 (125 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo 146 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo 146 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
Model | 146 | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1370 cc | 1149 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 64.9 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 50 L |