1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62.
Because 1941 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Bella | 62 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1610 mm |
