1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 1945 Jeep CJ2
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep CJ2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep CJ2 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella should accelerate faster than 1945 Jeep CJ2.
Because 1945 Jeep CJ2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1945 Jeep CJ2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (282 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1945 Jeep CJ2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 1945 Jeep CJ2 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
| Model | Bella | CJ2 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1945 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 282 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1630 mm |
