1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 1948 Austin 16
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1948 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella should accelerate faster than 1948 Austin 16.
Because 1948 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (282 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Austin 16. (146 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Austin 16.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 1948 Austin 16 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | Bella | 16 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 282 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1690 mm |