1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 1959 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,380 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac DeVille. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1959 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 1959 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Bella | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 6380 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2040 mm |
