1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 1962 Chrysler New Yorker
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher.
Because 1962 Chrysler New Yorker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Chrysler New Yorker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1962 Chrysler New Yorker has automatic transmission and 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella has manual transmission. 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1962 Chrysler New Yorker will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 1962 Chrysler New Yorker | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
| Model | Bella | New Yorker |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
