1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 1962 Simca 1000
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1962 Simca 1000. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella should accelerate faster than 1962 Simca 1000.
Because 1962 Simca 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Simca 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (282 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Simca 1000. (73 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 1962 Simca 1000 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Simca |
Model | Bella | 1000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 944 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 282 Nm | 73 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1260 mm |