1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 1963 BMW 502
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1963 BMW 502. (158 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 502.
Because 1963 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (282 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 502. (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 502.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 1963 BMW 502 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
| Model | Bella | 502 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 3168 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 282 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1540 mm |
