1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 1976 Triumph Dolomite
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Triumph Dolomite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Triumph Dolomite would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1976 Triumph Dolomite. (71 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella should accelerate faster than 1976 Triumph Dolomite.
Because 1976 Triumph Dolomite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Triumph Dolomite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (282 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Triumph Dolomite. (111 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Triumph Dolomite.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 1976 Triumph Dolomite | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Triumph |
Model | Bella | Dolomite |
Year Released | 1999 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 282 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1380 mm |