1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 1977 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (282 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 1977 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | Bella | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 282 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1400 mm |
