1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella.
Because 2000 Jaguar XKA is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar XKA. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 561 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. (282 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
| Model | Bella | XKA |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 4399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 466 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 282 Nm | 843 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
