1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (45 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (282 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Subaru |
Model | Bella | R2 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 282 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1530 mm |