1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 2009 SSC Aero
To start off, 2009 SSC Aero is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 SSC Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SSC Aero (1,062 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 839 more horse power than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SSC Aero should accelerate faster than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella.
Because 2009 SSC Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 SSC Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 SSC Aero (1,357 Nm @ 5800 RPM) has 1075 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. (282 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 SSC Aero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 2009 SSC Aero | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | SSC |
Model | Bella | Aero |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 1062 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 282 Nm | 1357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1090 mm |