1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. (282 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
Model | Bella | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 282 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1798 mm |