1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo vs. 1951 Allard K2
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo (187 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo | 1951 Allard K2 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
| Model | Dardo | K2 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 3622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
