1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo vs. 1962 Alpine A 110
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo (187 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 110.
Because 1962 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo | 1962 Alpine A 110 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Alpine |
Model | Dardo | A 110 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 38 L |