1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo (187 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo (222 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo | 1982 Chrysler E | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
| Model | Dardo | E |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 2555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 222 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2630 mm |
