1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo vs. 1982 Pontiac 1000
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Pontiac 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Pontiac 1000 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo (187 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1982 Pontiac 1000. (64 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo should accelerate faster than 1982 Pontiac 1000.
Because 1982 Pontiac 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Pontiac 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo (222 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Pontiac 1000. (109 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Pontiac 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo | 1982 Pontiac 1000 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Pontiac |
Model | Dardo | 1000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 109 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2400 mm |