1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo vs. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo (187 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo should accelerate faster than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager (229 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo. (222 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo | 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
| Model | Dardo | Grand Voyager |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 2429 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 222 Nm | 229 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3040 mm |
