1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo (187 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1996 Toyota 4Runner. (123 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota 4Runner.
Because 1996 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (295 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo. (222 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo | 1996 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | Dardo | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 21.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |