1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo vs. 2002 Mazda 626
To start off, 2002 Mazda 626 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo (187 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo (222 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 626. (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo Dardo | 2002 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Dardo | 626 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |