1999 Alpina B 12 vs. 1962 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1999 Alpina B 12 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 750 kg more than 1962 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Triumph Vitesse. (126 Nm). This means 1999 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alpina B 12 | 1962 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Alpina | Triumph |
Model | B 12 | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 126 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2270 mm |