1999 Alpina B 12 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1999 Alpina B 12 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 725 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1999 Alpina B 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Alpina B 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 357 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (112 Nm). This means 1999 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alpina B 12 | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Alpina | Mitsubishi |
Model | B 12 | Colt |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 112 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2390 mm |