1999 Alpina B 12 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alpina B 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alpina B 12 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 890 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 367 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1999 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alpina B 12 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Alpina | MCC |
Model | B 12 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 102 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 1810 mm |