1999 Alpina B 12 vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alpina B 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alpina B 12 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 236 kg more than 1999 Alpina B 12.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Alpina B 12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (330 Nm). This means 1999 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda BT-50.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alpina B 12 | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Alpina | Mazda |
Model | B 12 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 330 Nm |
Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 158 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1866 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3010 mm |