1999 Alpina B3 vs. 2012 Ascari KZ1
To start off, 2012 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alpina B3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alpina B3 would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ascari KZ1 (500 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1999 Alpina B3. (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ascari KZ1 should accelerate faster than 1999 Alpina B3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Alpina B3 weights approximately 350 kg more than 2012 Ascari KZ1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ascari KZ1 (550 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alpina B3. (455 Nm). This means 2012 Ascari KZ1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alpina B3.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alpina B3 | 2012 Ascari KZ1 | |
Make | Alpina | Ascari |
Model | B3 | KZ1 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 4941 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 500 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 455 Nm | 550 Nm |
Top Speed | 265 km/hour | 321 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1138 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2636 mm |