1999 Alpina B6 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alpina B6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Alpina B6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Alpina B6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alpina B6 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alpina | Ford |
Model | B6 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3200 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2490 mm |