1999 Aston Martin DB7 vs. 1969 Jaguar E-Type

To start off, 1999 Aston Martin DB7 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 Aston Martin DB7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Aston Martin DB7 (420 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. (225 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Aston Martin DB7 should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Aston Martin DB7 weights approximately 425 kg more than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Aston Martin DB7 1969 Jaguar E-Type
Make Aston Martin Jaguar
Model DB7 E-Type
Year Released 1999 1969
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5935 cc 4235 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 420 HP 225 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1825 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1240 mm 1190 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 89 L 63 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]