1999 Aston Martin Vantage vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1999 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Aston Martin Vantage (450 HP) has 253 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Aston Martin Vantage should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1999 Aston Martin Vantage.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Aston Martin Vantage (1,098 Nm) has 516 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Cadillac 62. (582 Nm). This means 1999 Aston Martin Vantage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Aston Martin Vantage | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
| Model | Vantage | 62 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5341 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 450 HP | 197 HP |
| Torque | 1098 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1970 kg | 2055 kg |
