1999 Audi A2 vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1999 Audi A2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Toyota Celica weights approximately 155 kg more than 1999 Audi A2.
Because 1976 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi A2 | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A2 | Celica |
Year Released | 1999 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2510 mm |