1999 Audi A2 vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1999 Audi A2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi A2 (247 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi A2 should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 181 kg more than 1999 Audi A2.
Because 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi A2 | 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | |
| Make | Audi | Matra-Simca |
| Model | A2 | Murena |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 2156 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.6 mm | 91.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.6 mm | 81.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1051 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4080 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2440 mm |
